Single correct option
Urban planners have long debated whether wide, multi-lane roads reduce congestion by increasing capacity or worsen it by inducing additional demand — a phenomenon in which drivers who previously avoided a route, chose a different time, or used public transport instead begin driving once the road appears to offer an easier trip. Decades of traffic data across dozens of cities now favour the second view with unusual consistency: widened roads fill to their old congestion levels within a few years, not because planners underestimated growth, but because the extra capacity itself generates the trips that consume it. The uncomfortable implication for policymakers is that a popular, visibly concrete solution to congestion — build more lanes — is one of the few traffic interventions that reliably fails to achieve its own stated purpose over any meaningful time horizon.
Which one of the following best captures the paragraph's central point?
Which one of the following best captures the paragraph's central point?
- A. Public transport is always a better investment than road construction for reducing urban congestion.
- B. Traffic data is too unreliable across different cities to draw any general conclusion about road widening.
- C. Widening roads to ease congestion tends to fail because the added capacity itself generates new trips that fill it back up, making this popular solution self-defeating.
- D. Urban planners have reached no consensus on whether wider roads help or worsen congestion.
Show answer and solution
Answer: (C) Widening roads to ease congestion tends to fail because the added capacity itself generates new trips that fill it back up, making this popular solution self-defeating.
The paragraph explicitly resolves the debate in favour of induced demand, using consistent multi-city data, and concludes road widening "reliably fails to achieve its own stated purpose." Option C matches this. A introduces a comparison (public transport) never made; B contradicts the paragraph's claim of "unusual consistency" in the data; D contradicts the paragraph's statement that the data "favour the second view" decisively.
Saved on this device. Sign in or create a free account to keep it on every device.